202505.01
29

Behind the Likes: Regulating Influencer Responsibility

The case highlights the tension between the freedom of speech of social media influencers and the reputation rights of businesses. The case underscores the role of social media influencers in educating consumers about product quality and safety, while also emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency from businesses. Background San Nutrition Pvt Ltd (San Nutrition)…

202504.28
29

Protection of Engineering Drawings – Copyright Vs Design

Supreme Court recently examined interplay between copyright and design protection in a dispute concerning infringement of intellectual property rights regarding the design and manufacturing of internal parts of cryogenic storage tanks and distribution systems used for transporting industrial gases and liquefied natural gas (LNG). The judgement addresses the maintainability of the appeals and the application…

202504.17
29

Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) Stumbles in a music licensing Dispute

Facts and Background Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) which owns and controls public performance rights of over 400 music labels with 45 lakh international and domestic sound recordings, issued a notice to Azure Hospitality Private Limited (Azure) on 20 July 2022, asking to cease and desist from exploiting the sound recordings in which PPL held copyright…

202504.04
29

Public Interest Prevails – Roche Denied Injunction in Patent Dispute

CS(COMM) 567/2024, Delhi High Court. Background F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (Roche) brought a Patent infringement case, at the Delhi High Court, against Natco Pharma Limited (Natco). The claim of Rochhe was based on infringement of its Patent for a compound Risdiplam marketed under the brand name EVRYSDI® used in the treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy…

202503.13
29

Letters Rogatory, a Valuable Tool for the Collection of Evidence across Borders.

Background The case involves a patent dispute between Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiaries (FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, LLC, PF PRISM IMB B.V., and Wyeth LLC) (Petitioners) against Softgel Healthcare Private Limited (Respondent), an Indian Company. The dispute centres around the alleged infringement of Pfizer’s “441 Patent” related to TAFAMIDIS 61 mg capsules, sold under the brand name…

202503.10
29

Abstract Theory not supported by Scientific Evidence lacks Novelty and Inventive Step

C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 4/2025, I.A. 3780/2025 & I.A. 3781/2025 Delhi High Court The appellants through this Appeal before the Delhi High Court sought to overturn a decision by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs refusing their patent application, titled “Innovative Change To Solve Any Dispute, Unexpected Business Loss, Closures, Financial Loss, Unexpected Accidents,”. The application was…

202502.17
29

India – Legal Landscape for Gaming Industry

Q1: How does the Indian legal system differentiate between games of chance and games of skill? The Indian courts have used the “dominant factor test” or “predominant test” to determine whether skill or chance plays a predominant part in determining the result of the game. Games based on skill are kept out of the purview…