Services
Our Publication
- 12Jul
High Court applies ‘doctrine of necessity’ on seeing huge pendency at IPAB
A recent writ petition before the Delhi High Court (Mylan Laboratories Limited Vs. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) 5571/2019 & C.M. Appln. 24540/2019 & 26833/2019) brought to court’s notice gridlock at Intellectual Property Appellate...11JulPrior use prevails over registration
The siblings, Gopal Sabu and Rajkumar Sabu (Raj) both working together, at one stage, as Directors of Sabu Trade Private Limited (STPL) are now at loggerheads to assert their rights over the mark SACHA MOTI... - 4Jul
Functional shape not enough to prove design is functional
What constitutes functionality of a Design has been considered by the court in this case. The court in its ruling determined whether constraints of functionality are such that the design in question is the only...1JulCourt holds registered proprietor is not expected to pursue every infringement
A number of interesting issues have come up in this matter a) whether a registered proprietor can enforce and restrain another proprietor from using its registered mark? b) is a registered proprietor obligated to pursue... - 21Jun
Court not impressed with Asus finding Zen in mobile phones
Two mobiles companies are at loggerheads over use of ZEN as a brand. Teleecare Network India Pvt. Ltd. (Teleecare) had filed suit for trademark infringement and passing off seeking an injunction against Asus Technology Pvt....3JunIndian Patent office rolls out a revised form to file statement of working
A peculiar requirement under the Indian Patent Act, section146 (1) read with Rule 131 (2), requires every Patent holder to submit before 31st March, a statement on Form 27 whether a Patent has been worked...
News & Events
- 21May
Our lawyers speak at INTA annual conference in Boston, USA- Fair Trade Principles in the IP World
Session pertained to “CM22 Fair Trade in IP Relations” where panelists discussed how law firms can apply the principles of fair trade to avoid malpractice and foster a positive workplace environment. Elaborating on various aspects...5MayOur lawyers speak on inclusion and equal opportunity employment
Rachna Bakhru was invited to speak at 25th Annual Day of National Thalassemia Welfare Association. The topics covered in discussion were policies of corporate and firms on inclusion and equal opportunity for people with disabilities,... - 3May
WIPR’s Influential Women in IP 2019
We are pleased to announce, Ms. Rachna Bakhru, Partner & Head of Dispute Resolution practice has been named as one of WIPR’s Influential Women in IP 2019. This new project by @WorldIPReview celebrates the IP...26AprWorld IP Day 2019
Our Managing Partner, Ranjan Narula spoke at the INTA Pre-Annual meeting roundtable organized by Khaitan & Co. in Mumbai on April 26, 2019. The speakers lineup included Sr. Counsel, Dr. Veerendra Tulzapurkar and Adheesh Nargolkar... - 12Apr
Session on “Trademark infringement and enforcement” at UPES University, Dehradun
Our Partner, Abhishek Nangia on invitation of UPES University, Dehradun interacted with law school students and faculty teachers on recent trends in ‘Trademark infringement and enforcement” on 12th April. The session generated active interest, deep...12AprTrustLaw Awards 2019
We are delighted to share that our firm has been nominated for the ninth annual TrustLaw Awards 2019 for our contribution on the project “Using Solar Power Energy to Refrigerate Vaccines” developed by Institute for...
Our Team
Ranjan Narula
Managing Partner
Ranjan founded the specialist IP law firm, RNA, IP Attorneys, in 2004, and is now its Managing Partner.
Rachna Bakhru
Partner
Rachna is a Partner with RNA and currently heads the Dispute Resolution team of the firm.
Rahul Sethi
Partner
Rahul is the Partner responsible for Investigations & anti-counterfeiting at RNA.
Rajiv Kumar Suri
Partner
Rajiv is a Partner with RNA. He currently heads the firm’s trade mark filing and prosecution practice.
Abhishek Nangia
Partner
Abhishek is a Partner with RNA. He has over 12 years of experience handling contentious IP cases.
