202608.25
36

Indian Patent Office Issues Guidelines on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Patent Examination

Executive Summary: The Indian Patent Office has introduced a structured framework for the responsible use of artificial intelligence in patent examination. AI may support classification, prior-art searches, translation, technical analysis and drafting, but every output must be treated as preliminary and independently checked. Confidential or unpublished information must not be entered into public AI tools,…

202608.25
36

Can “BALANCE” Save “PRO BALANCE”? Calcutta HC Says No at the Interim Stage

The Calcutta High Court, in a dispute concerning the use of the mark “PRO” in relation to footwear falling under Class 25, considered whether the use of “PRO BALANCE” by Aditya Birla Lifestyle Brands Limited and its associates amounted to infringement and passing off of Khadim India Limited’s registered “PRO” trademark. The Court, while considering…

202608.21
25

RNA Participates as Knowledge Partner at India IP Advantage Summit 2026

RNA has proudly participated as the Knowledge Partner at the India IP Advantage Summit 2026, organized by the Trade Promotion Council of India (TPCI) in New Delhi. As part of our collaboration with TPCI, RNA authored the report, “From India to the World: IP Strategy, Market Access and Risk Management for Exporters,” which was launched…

202608.19
36

Delhi High Court Sets Out a Seven-Step Test for Patentability of Mental Acts under Section 3(m) of the Patents Act

Background of the Case The appeal arose from the refusal of Indian Patent Application No. 468/DELNP/2008 titled “Method and Arrangement for Optimising the Operational Times and Cell Change Performance of Mobile Terminals.” During the proceedings, the Court noted that despite the existence of Section 3(m), there were no clear guidelines on how Patent Office examiners…

202608.18
36

The Price of Disobedience: Bombay High Court Imposes ₹50 Lakh Exemplary Costs in NOVA–NONI Dispute

The Bombay High Court recently considered two applications alleging wilful breach and disobedience of an injunction granted on 24 November 2010 in a trademark and copyright dispute concerning the mark “NOVA” and its associated artistic work. Since both applications arose from substantially the same alleged violations, the Court considered them together and disposed of them…

202608.10
36

Can Foreign Server Locations Oust the Jurisdiction of Indian Courts? The Emerging Position in Indian Digital Jurisprudence

The internet has blurred traditional ideas of territoriality. Businesses now rely on cloud infrastructure, data is stored and processed across borders, artificial intelligence models are trained on servers in different countries, and digital intermediaries operate through globally distributed networks. Against this backdrop, defendants in intellectual property disputes increasingly argue that Indian courts lack jurisdiction simply…

202608.06
36

L’Oréal Permitted to Add Infringement Claim in a Passing-Off Suit

In a recent decision, the High Court of Delhi considered whether a plaintiff that had instituted a passing-off action could amend its plaint to add a claim for trade mark infringement after securing registration of the mark during the pendency of the suit. The judgment affirms that procedural law should facilitate the effective adjudication of…

202608.04
36

Delhi High Court Clarifies When Trademark Disputes Can Be Referred to Arbitration

In a significant ruling concerning the arbitrability of trademark disputes arising from contractual arrangements, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court allowed an appeal against an order of the District Judge (Commercial), South District, Delhi, and referred the dispute between the parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996….