A major transformation was witnessed in the field of intellectual property rights, further introducing IP legislation for the very first time, establishing a new framework for trademark protection. The key updates are as follows: For trademark protection, the current process is publishing and filing of cautionary notice. The cautionary notice publicly asserts ownership of the…
The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court recently upheld the order of the District Judge, Commercial Court (South), Saket, dismissing Suparshva Swabs India’s plea for an interim injunction against AGN Tulip in an ongoing trademark dispute over the mark “TULIPS.” The plaintiff, proprietor of the registered mark and a long-standing manufacturer of cotton buds…
Bombay High Court vacates ex-parte injunction and imposes exemplary costs for concealment of material facts. The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant ruling in a trademark dispute involving the mark “DOCTOR EXTRA SOFT”, underscoring that equitable relief cannot be obtained through suppression of material facts. The matter arose from an application filed by Chaitanya…
Background The article summarises an Appeal filed by Wow Momo Foods Pvt. Ltd (WMFPL) against the judgement of the Single Judge of the Delhi High Court whereby it dismissed the injunction application of WMFPL, holding that “WOW” is a common, non-distinctive word. The appellant, WMFPL is the registered proprietor of several trademarks, including “WOW MOMO,”…
The Asian Patent Attorneys Association (APAA) annual council meeting is a distinguished forum that unites intellectual property professionals from around the world to share insights and strengthen professional networks. This year, the event was held in the Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia from November 06-10, 2025. We are proud that our Associate Partner, Suvarna Pandey, and Managing…
A massive thank you to our clients and the Asia IP Magazine research crew for this recognition, and big congratulations to everyone else who made the list! Here’s to continuing our innovation, collaboration, and excellence in intellectual property!
C.S No.602 of 2007 – Madras High Court – Date of Decision 3rd September 2025 Background The note discusses final decision of a case, post-trial, brought by Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited (TAFE), Chennai at the Madras High Court against Standard Corporation India Limited (SCIL), Punjab. TAFE alleged copyright infringement and passing off regarding artistic…
In Standard Essential Patent (SEP) disputes, especially those involving FRAND terms, confidentiality clubs play a vital role. They protect sensitive commercial data, such as licensing agreements, royalty rates, and negotiation records while allowing full and fair disclosure before the court. By restricting access to authorized counsels and experts, confidentiality clubs ensure that proprietary information is…
The Delhi High Court’s Division Bench recently examined the issue of transnational trademark protection in The Trustees of Princeton University v. The Vagdevi Educational Society & Ors (Vagdevi) FAO(OS) (COMM) 239/2023. The case was brought by the Princeton University before the IP Division of the Delhi High Court. Princeton University alleged trademark infringement on account…
The question whether cross examination is a discretionary remedy or a substantive right has come up before the Delhi High Court in context of post-grant oppositions filed against Novartis by three different Respondents with Controller General of Patents being pleaded as Respondent no 1, a) Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance (IPA) b) Micro Labs Limited and c)…
