“In an ideal world, all good patents ought to be granted and all bad ones should be refused. How that is to be achieved given the ever-rising flood of applications and the ever-increasing importance of Chinese prior art, I have no real idea” [“IP and Other Things”-Robin Jacob at page 239] It is a settled…
Relaxo Footwears Limited (Relaxo) brought an action against XS Brands Consultancy Private Limited & Ors (XS Brands). Relaxo relying on its rights in the device/mark seeks to restrain XS Brands from using the mark in relation to footwear. Relaxo does not claim any rights per se over the letter ‘X’ but only in the stylised…
In the trademark dispute between A.O. Smith Corporation and Star Smith Export Pvt. Ltd over the marks AO Smith and Start Smith, the Delhi High Court held the marks to be similar and use of Star Smith to be trademark infringement. The court also emphasized the significance of the dominant portion of the mark and…
We are pleased to announce that Ms. Suvarna Pandey, Associate Partner at RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys, recently visited AAU Incubation Center (Agri & Food Business Incubator), India’s leading Agri-Food Tech Incubation Center supported by Anand Agricultural University, Gujarat. Ms. Pandey conducted an insightful session on patent filing and prosecution in Agricultural technologies and…
Atyati sought to restrain Cognizant from using any mark identical or deceptively similar to its registered device mark. Atyati argued that Cognizant’s application for registration in Classes 35 and 42 evidenced its intention to free-ride on the goodwill and reputation of the ATYATI mark. The court found that Atyati had made a prima facie case…
This note discusses the final judgement post-trial passed by the Madras High Court in a suit filed by the well-known tyre manufacturer MRF. The Plaintiff, MRF Limited filed the suit against the Defendant, Powermax Rubber Factory and Ors, (Powermax) alleging infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, damages, etc. MRF relying on its rights in the…
The case involved an agreement between the parties for the purchase of trademarks for a specified amount spread over a certain period of time. The High Court found that the defendants had failed to comply with the conditions for the transfer of the trademarks. The partial payment made by the defendants did not entitle them…
Madras High Court in a dispute between two entities in the pharmaceutical industry restrains use of a deceptively similar mark. The Plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceuticals Limited (Sun Pharma) filed the suit against the Defendant, Kivi Labs Ltd (Kivi Labs) alleging trademark infringement, passing off, damages, etc,. Sun Pharma relying on its rights in the registered mark…
Use of the mark/name ‘Jindal’ is the bone of contention between the parties before the Delhi High Court. The Plaintiff, Jindal Industries Private Limited (JIPL), relying on its rights in the registered trademark JINDAL filed the suit against the Defendants, Suncity Sheets Private Limited (Suncity) and Ors, alleging trademark infringement, passing off, etc. The injunction…
As part of our IP Awareness Campaign, our Senior Associate Girish Bhatia was recently invited by the IP Press to lead a session on the subject of “Remedies, Renewal, and Rectification of Trade Marks.” The virtual session held on May 11, 2024, delved into various aspects of these intricate topics. Girish provided practical examples to…
