202505.21
29

Delhi High Court recognises TAJ as a well-known trademark

IHCL sought a declaration that TAJ is a well-known mark for hospitality services and presented comprehensive evidence to substantiate its claim The court concluded that TAJ qualifies as a well-known mark under Section 2(1)(zg) The mark’s expansive international footprint and substantial revenue generation reinforced its status The Indian Hotels Company Limited (IHCL) has recently secured…

202505.20
29

KROMALITE vs CHROMALITE: Brand Battles in the Beauty Industry

In a recent ruling that reinforces the strength of prior use in trademark law, the Delhi High Court granted interim relief to FDC Limited in a passing off action against Palsons Derma Private Limited. The dispute centers on the alleged deceptive similarity between the plaintiff’s mark “KROMALITE” and the defendant’s mark “CHROMALITE”, both used for…

202505.13
29

Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL), caught between a rock and a hard place!

Background The fallout from the Azure litigation discussed in my earlier post https://rnaip.com/phonographic-performance-limited-ppl-stumbles-in-a-music-licensing-dispute/ has put PPL in a tight spot. The dispute started over royalty payments for sound recordings licensed to PPL. The Single Judge of the Delhi High Court ruled in favour of PPL and stopped Azure from playing PPL’s copyrighted works without a…

202505.01
29

Behind the Likes: Regulating Influencer Responsibility

The case highlights the tension between the freedom of speech of social media influencers and the reputation rights of businesses. The case underscores the role of social media influencers in educating consumers about product quality and safety, while also emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency from businesses. Background San Nutrition Pvt Ltd (San Nutrition)…