202409.19
27

Fraudster Files a Domain Complaint against the Real Domain Owner

Possibly, the first of its kind domain dispute (case no D2024-2516) before the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation where the Complainant was found to have impersonated the Respondent and its vice president Mr. Williams, and fraudulently tried to gain control of its domain name <qw.com>. Facts and Background Parties Involved: The Complainant was filed by Quickware,…

202409.10
27

Madras High Court holds ‘CALDALE’ not similar to ‘CARDACE’

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH (Sanofi) has filed this appeal before the Madras High Court against the order of the Assistant Registrar of Trademarks, Chennai in opposition proceedings dismissing opposition against the mark CALDALE of Jagdale Industries Private Limited (Jagdale). Sanofi, the registered proprietor of the mark, CARDACE in class 5 filed opposition against the mark CALDALE…

202409.05
27

Delhi High Court Allows Blackberry Patent on ‘Auto Selection of Media Files’

Background: The convergence of various technologies on single devices has posed significant challenges to technology developers. The Appellant, BlackBerry Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of Ontario, Canada, specializes in providing telecommunication products, services, and solutions. The present appeal under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, was originally filed by BlackBerry Limited before…

202409.02
27

Delhi High Court upholds TSL Tirupati to be similar to ‘MM Tirupati’

‘Tirupati’, the city where the famous Sri Venkateswara Temple sits atop one of the 7 peaks of Tirumala Hills is the bone of contention in the instant dispute between two entities for goods falling in class 17 The Plaintiff, Tirupati Structurals Limited (TSL) filed the suit, at the Delhi High Court, against the Defendant, Jai…

202408.29
27

Lacoste says no space for two crocodiles

The case involves a trademark dispute between Lacoste and Crocodile International Pte Ltd. over the use of a crocodile device on clothing articles. Lacoste initiated the lawsuit to protect their copyright and trademark rights in the crocodile device, which they claim is being infringed upon by Crocodile International. Lacoste in the lawsuit seeks a permanent…

202408.21
27

PROTECTION OF TATTOOS AS COPYRIGHT WORK IN INDIA

The note discusses protection of tattoos as copyright work in India. People are fascinated by tattoos for several reasons: Self-Expression: Tattoos are a means of self-expression through creativity and originality. They allow individuals to showcase their personality, beliefs, and experiences in a unique and permanent way. Cultural Significance: Tattoos have been practiced since prehistoric times…

202408.20
27

Delhi High Court upholds protection for alphanumeric codes as trademarks

The case revolves around the use of specific alpha numerals in trademarks. The court ruled that if a particular alpha numeral, used as part of a trademark, is unique to a product and has become a source identifier, the proprietor of the trademark would be entitled to protection in respect of the said alpha numerals,…

202408.13
27

Vans Inc. fails in its attempt to cancel the mark “IVANS” and “IV ANS NXT”

Vans Inc., USA, (hereinafter referred to as “Petitioner”) filed rectification petitions seeking cancellation of FCB Garment Tex India Pvt. Ltd. and Fateh Chand Bhansali’s (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Respondent”) trademarks “IVANS” and “IV ANS NXT” (impugned marks) under Sections 47, 57 and 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the said…

202408.13
27

JK cement restrained from using ‘WEATHERSHIELD’

Akzo Nobel Coatings International B V (Akzo) filed the suit against JK Cement Ltd (JK Cement) alleging trademark infringement, passing off, etc., and to restrain the latter from using the mark ‘WEATHERSHIELD’. This note discusses the contentions raised by the parties and the findings of the Court. The court examined various aspects, including the distinctiveness…

202407.25
27

High Court sets aside injunction for suppression of material facts

This is the second round of litigation between Cognizant Technologies Solutions (Cognizant) and Atyati Technologies Private Limited (Atyati). The bone of contention is the use of the logo as depicted below: Atyati brought this suit for trademark and copyright infringement at the Bombay High Court and the High Court vide its order dated March 19,…